Correlation of Theoretical Uncertainties in PDF Fits and Theoretical Uncertainties in Predictions
Richard D. Ball, Rosalyn L. Pearson

TL;DR
This paper explores how accounting for correlations between theoretical uncertainties in PDF fits and predictions can improve the accuracy and precision of LHC process predictions, such as top production and Higgs cross-sections.
Contribution
It introduces a method to incorporate correlations between uncertainties in PDF fits and predictions, leading to more accurate and precise theoretical results.
Findings
Corrections to central prediction values are possible.
PDF and theoretical uncertainties can be reduced.
Predictions for LHC processes are improved.
Abstract
We show how to account for correlations between theoretical uncertainties incorporated in parton distribution function (PDF) fits, and the theoretical uncertainties in the predictions made using these PDFs. We demonstrate by explicit calculations, both analytical and numerical, that these correlations can lead to corrections to the central values of the predictions, and reductions in both the PDF uncertainties and the theoretical uncertainties in the prediction. We illustrate our results with predictions for top production rapidity distributions and the Higgs total cross-section at the LHC, using the NLO NNPDF3.1 PDF set which incorporates missing higher order uncertainties. We conclude that the inclusion of correlations can increase both the accuracy and precision of predictions involving PDFs, particularly for processes with data already included in the PDF fit.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
