Progenitor mass constraints for the type Ib intermediate-luminosity SN 2015ap and the highly extinguished SN 2016bau
Amar Aryan, S. B. Pandey, WeiKang Zheng, Alexei V. Filippenko, Jozsef, Vinko, Ryoma Ouchi, Isaac Shivvers, Heechan Yuk, Sahana Kumar, Samantha, Stegman, Goni Halevi, Timothy W. Ross, Carolina Gould, Sameen Yunus, Raphael, Baer-Way, Asia deGraw, Keiichi Maeda, D. Bhattacharya

TL;DR
This study constrains the progenitor masses of two Type Ib supernovae, 2015ap and 2016bau, through photometric, spectroscopic analysis, and stellar evolution modeling, suggesting a 12 solar mass progenitor for 2015ap and a slightly less massive progenitor for 2016bau.
Contribution
It combines observational data with stellar evolution and explosion modeling to estimate progenitor masses of intermediate-luminosity Type Ib supernovae, providing new insights into their origins.
Findings
Progenitor of SN 2015ap likely a 12 M_sun ZAMS star.
Progenitor of SN 2016bau is near the boundary between SN and non-SN.
Modeling results closely match observed properties, supporting progenitor mass estimates.
Abstract
Photometric and spectroscopic analyses of the intermediate-luminosity Type Ib supernova (SN) 2015ap and of the heavily reddened Type Ib SN~2016bau are discussed. Photometric properties of the two SNe, such as colour evolution, bolometric luminosity, photospheric radius, temperature, and velocity evolution, are also constrained. The ejecta mass, synthesised nickel mass, and kinetic energy of the ejecta are calculated from their light-curve analysis. We also model and compare the spectra of SN~2015ap and SN~2016bau at various stages of their evolution. The P~Cygni profiles of various lines present in the spectra are used to determine the velocity evolution of the ejecta. To account for the observed photometric and spectroscopic properties of the two SNe, we have computed 12\, zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) star models and evolved them until the onset of core collapse using the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
