Curved space equilibration vs. flat space thermalization (a short review)
E.T.Akhmedov (MIPT, ITEP)

TL;DR
This review explores how equilibration in expanding universes differs from thermalization in flat spacetime, emphasizing the importance of non-invariant states and IR effects in understanding quantum field dynamics in curved backgrounds.
Contribution
It highlights the necessity of considering non-invariant states with proper UV behavior to understand quantum equilibration in strongly curved spacetimes.
Findings
Non-invariant states are crucial for accurate quantum field dynamics.
IR secular memory effects influence the evolution of observables.
Equilibration may be delayed until curvature decreases significantly.
Abstract
We discuss equilibration process in expanding universes as compared to the thermalization process in Minkowski space--time. The final goal is to answer the following question: Is the equilibrium reached before the rapid expansion stops and quantum effects have a negligible effect on the background geometry or stress--energy fluxes in a highly curved early Universe have strong effects on the expansion rate and the equilibrium is reached only after the drastic decrease of the space--time curvature? We argue that consideration of more generic non--invariant states in theories with invariant actions is a necessary ingredient to understand quantum field dynamics in strongly curved backgrounds. We are talking about such states in which correlation functions are not functions of such isometry invariants as geodesic distances, while having correct UV behaviour. The reason to consider such…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
