Quantifying patient and neighborhood risks for stillbirth and preterm birth in Philadelphia with a Bayesian spatial model

TL;DR

This study uses a Bayesian spatial model to analyze how patient and neighborhood factors influence risks of stillbirth and preterm birth in Philadelphia, revealing significant spatial and demographic disparities.

Contribution

It introduces a Bayesian spatial modeling approach to quantify neighborhood and patient risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes, highlighting the importance of place-based factors.

Findings

Neighborhood risk for stillbirth is 2.68 times higher in high-risk areas.

Higher neighborhood poverty correlates with increased adverse birth risks.

Neighborhoods with more college-educated women have lower risks.

Abstract

Stillbirth and preterm birth are major public health challenges. Using a Bayesian spatial model, we quantified patient-specific and neighborhood risks of stillbirth and preterm birth in the city of Philadelphia. We linked birth data from electronic health records at Penn Medicine hospitals from 2010 to 2017 with census-tract-level data from the United States Census Bureau. We found that both patient-level characteristics (e.g. self-identified race/ethnicity) and neighborhood-level characteristics (e.g. violent crime) were significantly associated with patients' risk of stillbirth or preterm birth. Our neighborhood analysis found that higher-risk census tracts had 2.68 times the average risk of stillbirth and 2.01 times the average risk of preterm birth compared to lower-risk census tracts. Higher neighborhood rates of women in poverty or on public assistance were significantly associated with greater neighborhood risk for these outcomes, whereas higher neighborhood rates of college-educated women or women in the labor force were significantly associated with lower risk. Several of these neighborhood associations were missed by the patient-level analysis. These results suggest that neighborhood-level analyses of adverse pregnancy outcomes can reveal nuanced relationships and, thus, should be considered by epidemiologists. Our findings can potentially guide place-based public health interventions to reduce stillbirth and preterm birth rates.