Complex vs convex Morse functions and geodesic open books
Pierre Dehornoy, Burak Ozbagci

TL;DR
This paper compares three different constructions of open books on the unit (co)tangent bundle of a surface, showing they are isotopic under certain conditions and analyzing their genus properties.
Contribution
It establishes isotopy equivalences among complex, contact, and dynamical open books on surface bundles based on Morse functions and divides.
Findings
Open books are pairwise isotopic if Morse functions are adapted.
None are planar if the surface has positive genus.
Identifies cases where open books have genus one pages.
Abstract
Suppose that is a closed and oriented surface equipped with a Riemannian metric. In the literature, there are three seemingly distinct constructions of open books on the unit (co)tangent bundle of , having complex, contact, and dynamical flavors, respectively. Each one of these constructions is based on either an admissible divide or an ordered Morse function on . We show that the resulting open books are pairwise isotopic provided that the ordered Morse function is adapted to the admissible divide on . Moreover, we observe that if has positive genus, then none of these open books are planar and furthermore, we determine the only cases when they have genus one pages.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMorphological variations and asymmetry · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
