Proof of a conjecture of Dahmen and Beukers on counting integral Lam\'{e} equations with finite monodromy
Zhijie Chen, Ting-Jung Kuo, Chang-Shou Lin

TL;DR
This paper proves Dahmen and Beukers' conjecture on counting integral Lamé equations with finite monodromy groups, using modular forms and Painlevé VI equations, revealing deep connections with algebraic solutions of Painlevé equations.
Contribution
It establishes the explicit formula for the number of such Lamé equations and links it to the vanishing order of a new modular form, employing Painlevé VI equations for the proof.
Findings
Confirmed the conjectured formula for counting Lamé equations.
Connected the problem to the vanishing order of a modular form.
Linked the counting problem to algebraic solutions of Painlevé VI.
Abstract
In this paper, we prove Dahmen and Beukers' conjecture that the number of integral Lam\'{e} equations with index modulo scalar equivalence with the monodromy group dihedral of order is given by \[L_{n}(N)=\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{n(n+1)\Psi(N)}{24}-\left( a_{n}% \phi(N)+b_{n}\phi(\tfrac{N}{2}) \right) \right) +\frac{2}% {3}\varepsilon_{n}(N).\] Our main tool is the new pre-modular form of weight introduced by Lin and Wang \cite{LW2} and the associated modular form of weight , where the product runs over all -torsion points of exact order . We show that this conjecture is equivalent to the precise formula of the vanishing order of at infinity: \[v_{\infty}(M_{n,N}(\tau))=a_{n}\phi(N)+b_{n}\phi( N/2).\] This formula is extremely hard to prove…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNonlinear Waves and Solitons · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
