TL;DR
This paper investigates how the presence of additional planets affects radial velocity follow-up measurements of transiting exoplanets, revealing that unseen companions significantly increase the number of observations needed for accurate mass determination.
Contribution
It introduces a statistical model to predict the occurrence of planetary companions and quantifies their impact on RV follow-up efforts, highlighting the need for more observations in multi-planet systems.
Findings
About 52% of the time, the transiting planet is not the dominant RV signal.
Unseen planetary companions can double or triple the number of observations needed for accurate mass measurements.
Next-generation RV instruments still require hundreds of observations to characterize planets accurately in multi-planet systems.
Abstract
Population studies of Kepler's multi-planet systems have revealed a surprising degree of structure in their underlying architectures. Information from a detected transiting planet can be combined with a population model to make predictions about the presence and properties of additional planets in the system. Using a statistical model for the distribution of planetary systems (He et al. 2020; arXiv:2007.14473), we compute the conditional occurrence of planets as a function of the period and radius of Kepler-detectable planets. About half () of the time, the detected planet is not the planet with the largest semi-amplitude in the system, so efforts to measure the mass of the transiting planet with radial velocity (RV) follow-up will have to contend with additional planetary signals in the data. We simulate RV observations to show that assuming a single-planet model to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
