Star Formation Rate Function at $z\sim4.5$: An Analysis from rest UV to Optical
Y. Asada (1), K. Ohta (1), F. Maeda (1, 2) ((1) Department of, Astronomy Kyoto University, (2) Institute of Astronomy The University of, Tokyo)

TL;DR
This study derives a star formation rate function at redshift ~4.5 using multi-wavelength SED fitting, revealing a higher number density of star-forming galaxies than UV-based estimates and emphasizing the dominance of intensely star-forming galaxies at this epoch.
Contribution
It presents the first SFRF at z~4.5 based on rest UV to optical data, correcting for sample incompleteness, and compares it with UV-based functions to reveal significant excess.
Findings
SFRF shows a larger number density than UV estimates by ~1 dex.
Cosmic star formation rate density is ~0.25 dex higher than previous UV-based measurements.
Most of the cosmic star formation activity is contributed by galaxies with SFR > 10 M_sun/yr.
Abstract
We present a star formation rate function (SFRF) at based on photometric data from rest UV to optical of galaxies in the CANDELS GOODS-South field using spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting. We evaluate the incompleteness of our sample and correct for it to properly confront the SFRF in this study with those estimated based on other probes. The SFRF is obtained down to and it shows a significant excess to that estimated from UV luminosity function and dust correction based on UV spectral slope. As compared with the UV-based SFRF, the number density is larger by dex at a fixed SFR, or the best-fit Schechter parameter of is larger by dex. We extensively examine several assumptions on SED fitting to see the robustness of our result, and find that the excess still exist even if the assumptions change such…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
