Comparison of numerical methods for computing the repeated Compton scattering of photons in isotropic media
Sandeep Kumar Acharya, Jens Chluba, Abir Sarkar

TL;DR
This paper compares various Fokker-Planck approximations to the exact solution for repeated Compton scattering in astrophysical plasmas, highlighting their accuracy limits and applicability for modeling cosmic microwave background distortions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed numerical comparison of FP methods against exact scattering kernel solutions, clarifies their applicability, and emphasizes the importance of exact treatments for accurate CMB spectral distortion predictions.
Findings
Kompaneets equation is robust but less accurate at high energies.
Exact kernel methods are necessary for precise CMB distortion modeling.
FP approximations fail to reproduce equilibrium solutions in multiple scattering regimes.
Abstract
Repeated Compton scattering of photons with thermal electrons is one of the fundamental processes at work in many astrophysical plasma. Solving the exact evolution equations is hard and one common simplification is based on Fokker-Planck (FP) approximations of the Compton collision term. Here we carry out a detailed numerical comparison of several FP approaches with the exact scattering kernel solution for a range of test problems assuming isotropic media and thermal electrons at various temperatures. The Kompaneets equation, being one of the most widely used FP approximations, fails to account for Klein-Nishina corrections and enhanced Doppler boosts and recoil at high energies. These can be accounted for with an alternative FP approach based on the exact first and second moments of the scattering kernel. As demonstrated here, the latter approach works very well in dilute media, but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
