Upper and lower bounds on the size of $B_k[g]$ sets
Griffin Johnston, Michael Tait, and Craig Timmons

TL;DR
This paper advances the understanding of the maximum size of $B_k[g]$ sets by improving upper bounds for larger $g$ and $k$, and refining bounds for the case $g=1$, combining theoretical bounds with constructions.
Contribution
It provides new upper bounds for $F_{k,g}(n)$ for large $g$ and $k$, and improves the error term in the case $g=1$, also matching a known lower bound construction.
Findings
Improved upper bounds on $F_{k,g}(n)$ for $g>1$ and large $k$.
Matched the best known upper bound for $g=1$ with an improved error term.
Provided a lower bound matching Lindström's construction, removing a hypothesis.
Abstract
A subset of the integers is a set if the number of multisets from that sum to any fixed integer is at most . Let denote the maximum size of a set in . In this paper we improve the best-known upper bounds on for and large. When we match the best upper bound of Green with an improved error term. Additionally, we give a lower bound on that matches a construction of Lindstr\"om while removing one of the hypotheses.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems · Analytic Number Theory Research
