Breaking of Ginzburg-Landau description in the temperature dependence of the anisotropy in the nematic superconductor
M.I. Bannikov, R.S. Akzyanov, N.K. Zhurbina, S.I. Khaldeev, Yu.G., Selivanov, V.V. Zavyalov, A.L. Rakhmanov, A.Yu. Kuntsevich

TL;DR
This study investigates the temperature dependence of anisotropy in nematic superconductor Sr$_x$Bi$_2$Se$_3$, revealing deviations from Ginzburg-Landau theory predictions and challenging the strain-based symmetry breaking explanation.
Contribution
The paper presents systematic measurements of $H_{c2}$ anisotropy in Sr$_x$Bi$_2$Se$_3$, showing a smooth temperature dependence that contradicts existing Ginzburg-Landau theory predictions.
Findings
Anisotropy weakly depends on temperature below 0.8 T_c
Anisotropy decreases smoothly near T_c without singularity
Results challenge the Ginzburg-Landau description of nematic superconductors
Abstract
Nematic superconductors are characterized by an apparent crystal symmetry breaking that results in the anisotropy of the in-plane upper critical magnetic field . The symmetry breaking is usually attributed to the strain of the crystal lattice. The nature and the value of the strain are debatable. We perform systematic measurements of the anisotropy in the high-quality SrBiSe single crystals in the temperature range 1.8~K~K using temperature stabilization with an accuracy of 0.0001 K. We observe that in all tested samples the anisotropy is weakly temperature dependent when and smoothly decreases at higher temperatures without any sign of singularity when . Such a behavior {is in a drastic contradiction with the prediction of} the Ginzburg-Landau theory for the nematic superconductors. We discuss possible…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
