Late-Time Hubble Space Telescope Observations of a Hydrogen-Poor Superluminous Supernova Reveal the Power-Law Decline of a Magnetar Central Engine
Peter K. Blanchard (1), Edo Berger (2), Matt Nicholl (3), Ryan, Chornock (1), Sebastian Gomez (2), Griffin Hosseinzadeh (2) ((1), Northwestern/CIERA, (2) Harvard/CfA, (3) University of Birmingham)

TL;DR
This study presents late-time Hubble observations of a hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova, revealing a magnetar-powered light curve decline that challenges the PISN hypothesis and suggests diverse energy sources.
Contribution
It demonstrates that late-time light curve analysis can distinguish between PISN and magnetar models in hydrogen-poor SLSNe, highlighting the role of magnetar spin-down.
Findings
Light curve flattening inconsistent with radioactive decay of $^{56}$Co.
Light curve matches magnetar spin-down with a shallower power law.
High ejecta mass (~20 M$_{ ext{odot}}$) inferred for the supernova.
Abstract
The light curve diversity of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) has kept open the possibility that multiple power sources account for the population. Specifically, pair-instability explosions (PISNe), which produce large masses of Ni, have been argued as the origin of some slowly-evolving SLSNe. Here we present detailed observations of SN 2016inl (=PS16fgt), a slowly-evolving SLSN at , whose unusually red spectrum matches PS1-14bj, a SLSN with an exceptionally long rise time consistent with a PISN. Ground-based and Hubble Space Telescope data, spanning about 800 rest-frame days, reveal a significant light curve flattening, similar to that seen in SN 2015bn, and much slower than the decline rate expected from radioactive decay of Co. We therefore conclude that despite its slow evolution, SN 2016inl is inconsistent with a PISN. Instead, the light curve…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
