Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition
Jessica Santiago (Victoria University of Wellington), Sebastian, Schuster (Charles University of Prague), and Matt Visser (Victoria University, of Wellington)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that all physically reasonable warp drives inherently violate the null energy condition, challenging recent claims of possible positive-energy warp drives and emphasizing the unavoidable nature of energy condition violations in general relativity.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis showing that warp drives cannot satisfy the null energy condition, countering prior incomplete claims and extending the argument to modified gravity theories.
Findings
All warp drives violate the null energy condition.
Warp drives violate the weak, strong, and dominant energy conditions.
Energy condition violations are unavoidable in standard and modified gravity frameworks.
Abstract
Three very recent articles have claimed that it is possible to, at least in theory, either set up positive energy warp drives satisfying the weak energy condition (WEC), or at the very least, to minimize the WEC violations. These claims are at best incomplete, since the arguments presented only demonstrate the existence of one set of timelike observers, the co-moving Eulerian observers, who see "nice" physics. While these observers might see a positive energy density, the WEC requires all timelike observers to see positive energy density. Therefore, one should revisit this issue. A more careful analysis shows that the situation is actually much grimmer than advertised -- all physically reasonable warp drives will violate the null energy condition, and so also automatically violate the WEC, and both the strong and dominant energy conditions. While warp drives are certainly interesting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
