Digital Voodoo Dolls
Marija Slavkovik, Clemens Stachl, Caroline Pitman, Jonathan Askonas

TL;DR
The paper introduces the concept of digital voodoo dolls, high-fidelity person models that operate independently of the individual, raising ethical concerns about accountability and control.
Contribution
It conceptualizes digital voodoo dolls, compares them with existing person models, and discusses ethical issues and mitigation strategies.
Findings
Digital voodoo dolls are independent of the person they represent.
They pose significant ethical challenges regarding accountability.
Mitigation strategies for ethical concerns are proposed.
Abstract
An institution, be it a body of government, commercial enterprise, or a service, cannot interact directly with a person. Instead, a model is created to represent us. We argue the existence of a new high-fidelity type of person model which we call a digital voodoo doll. We conceptualize it and compare its features with existing models of persons. Digital voodoo dolls are distinguished by existing completely beyond the influence and control of the person they represent. We discuss the ethical issues that such a lack of accountability creates and argue how these concerns can be mitigated.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Methodstravel james
