Non-Semantic Evaluation of Image Forensics Tools: Methodology and Database
Quentin Bammey (CB), Tina Nikoukhah (CB), Marina Gardella (CB), Rafael, Grompone (CB), Miguel Colom (CB), Jean-Michel Morel (CB)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a methodology for creating challenging non-semantic image forgeries and presents a new database to evaluate forensic tools, highlighting their limitations in detecting subtle alterations.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel methodology for generating non-semantic forgeries and introduces the Trace database for benchmarking forensic tools.
Findings
State-of-the-art forensic tools struggle to detect the created forgeries.
The Trace database provides a challenging benchmark for future forensic research.
The methodology isolates forgery cues from semantic content, focusing on technical alterations.
Abstract
With the aim of evaluating image forensics tools, we propose a methodology to create forgeries traces, leaving intact the semantics of the image. Thus, the only forgery cues left are the specific alterations of one or several aspects of the image formation pipeline. This methodology creates automatically forged images that are challenging to detect for forensic tools and overcomes the problem of creating convincing semantic forgeries. Based on this methodology, we create the Trace database and conduct an evaluation of the main state-of-the-art image forensics tools.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Non-Semantic Evaluation of Image Forensics Tools: Methodology and Database· youtube
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Media Forensic Detection · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Cell Image Analysis Techniques
