Reliability Testing for Natural Language Processing Systems
Samson Tan, Shafiq Joty, Kathy Baxter, Araz Taeihagh, Gregory A., Bennett, Min-Yen Kan

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of reliability testing in NLP systems, proposing a framework that uses adversarial attacks to evaluate fairness and robustness, aiming to improve accountability and standards.
Contribution
It introduces a novel framework for reliability testing in NLP, integrating adversarial attacks and interdisciplinary approaches to enhance system evaluation.
Findings
Reliability testing can identify fairness and robustness issues.
Adversarial attacks can be reframed for reliability assessment.
Interdisciplinary collaboration enhances testing effectiveness.
Abstract
Questions of fairness, robustness, and transparency are paramount to address before deploying NLP systems. Central to these concerns is the question of reliability: Can NLP systems reliably treat different demographics fairly and function correctly in diverse and noisy environments? To address this, we argue for the need for reliability testing and contextualize it among existing work on improving accountability. We show how adversarial attacks can be reframed for this goal, via a framework for developing reliability tests. We argue that reliability testing -- with an emphasis on interdisciplinary collaboration -- will enable rigorous and targeted testing, and aid in the enactment and enforcement of industry standards.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
