Mind Reading at Work: Cooperation without common ground
Peter Wallis

TL;DR
This paper explores a novel approach to enabling computers to engage in more human-like conversations by leveraging the concept of situated action, moving beyond traditional methods focused on joint co-construction and mentalizing.
Contribution
It proposes a new framework based on situated action AI to improve computer-human interaction without relying on common ground or mental state modeling.
Findings
Highlights limitations of current conversational AI
Introduces situated action as a promising alternative
Suggests future research directions in AI communication
Abstract
As Stefan Kopp and Nicole Kramer say in their recent paper[Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021) 597], despite some very impressive demonstrations over the last decade or so, we still don't know how how to make a computer have a half decent conversation with a human. They argue that the capabilities required to do this include incremental joint co-construction and mentalizing. Although agreeing whole heartedly with their statement of the problem, this paper argues for a different approach to the solution based on the "new" AI of situated action.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI · AI in Service Interactions · Action Observation and Synchronization
