Necessity of selfconsistent calculations for the electromagnetic field in probing the nuclear symmetry energy using pion observables in heavy-ion collisions
Gao-Feng Wei, Chang Liu, Xin-Wei Cao, Qi-Jun Zhi, Wen-Jun Xiao,, Chao-Yun Long, Zheng-Wen Long

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that selfconsistent electromagnetic field calculations are crucial for accurately interpreting pion observables in heavy-ion collisions, impacting the probing of nuclear symmetry energy.
Contribution
It shows that simplified electromagnetic field models neglecting radiation fields are insufficient, emphasizing the need for selfconsistent calculations in heavy-ion collision analyses.
Findings
Simplified Li9nard-Wiechert formula omits significant radiation effects.
Selfconsistent electromagnetic calculations significantly influence charged pion ratios.
Double bc2/bc7 ratio remains a robust probe despite electromagnetic calculation differences.
Abstract
Within an isospin- and momentum-dependent transport model, we investigate the necessity of selfconsistent calculations for the electromagnetic field in probing the nuclear symmetry energy using pion observables in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies. To this end, we perform the Ru + Ru collisions at 400 MeV/nucleon with two calculations scenarios for the electromagnetic field including the selfconsistent calculation and the most used Li\'{e}nard-Wiechert formula, while the latter is a simplified one of the complete Li\'{e}nard-Wiechert formula by neglecting the radiation field for practical calculations in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate and/or relativistic energies. As a comparison, we also consider the static Coulomb field formula for calculations of the electromagnetic field in heavy-ion collisions. It is shown that the most used simplified…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
