Unitary Interactions Do Not Yield Outcomes: Attempting to Model "Wigner's Friend"
R. E. Kastner

TL;DR
This paper critically analyzes an experiment related to Wigner's Friend, arguing that the data do not support the idea of incompatible facts among observers and highlighting that under strict unitarity, measurement outcomes cannot be empirically obtained.
Contribution
It challenges the interpretation of the Wigner's Friend experiment by showing that measurement outcomes are incompatible with strict unitarity and proposes an alternative quantum framework.
Findings
Violation of Bell inequality does not imply inconsistent facts.
Under unitarity, no definite measurement outcomes occur internally.
An alternative quantum formulation explains the experimental data.
Abstract
An experiment by Proietti {\it et al} purporting to instantiate the `Wigner's Friend' thought experiment is discussed. It is pointed out that the stated implications of the experiment regarding the alleged irreconcilability of facts attributed to different observers warrant critical review. In particular, violation of a Clauser-Horne-Shimony inequality by the experimental data actually shows that the attribution of measurement outcomes to the ``Friends'' (modeled by internal photons undergoing unitary interactions) is erroneous. An elementary but often overlooked result regarding improper mixtures is adduced in support of this assessment. A counterexample is provided which refutes the popular notion that quantum theory leads to `relative facts' that never manifest as empirical inconsistencies. It is further noted that under an assumption of unbroken unitarity, no measurement correlation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
