Micro-level network dynamics of scientific collaboration and impact: relational hyperevent models for the analysis of coauthor networks

TL;DR

This paper introduces relational hyperevent models (RHEM) and outcome models (RHOM) for analyzing the dynamics and impact of scientific coauthor networks, linking collaboration patterns to scientific success.

Contribution

It adapts RHEM to include outcome variables like citation impact and develops RHOM to jointly model collaboration likelihood and scientific performance.

Findings

Applied models to over 350,000 papers across three disciplines.

Demonstrated how collaboration variables influence scientific impact.

Provided a framework for joint analysis of team formation and success.

Abstract

We discuss a recently proposed family of statistical network models - relational hyperevent models (RHEM) - for analyzing team selection and team performance in scientific coauthor networks. The underlying rationale for using RHEM in studies of coauthor networks is that scientific collaboration is intrinsically polyadic, that is, it typically involves teams of any size. Consequently, RHEM specify publication rates associated with hyperedges representing groups of scientists of any size. Going beyond previous work on RHEM for meeting data, we adapt this model family to settings in which relational hyperevents have a dedicated outcome, such as a scientific paper with a measurable impact (e.g., the received number of citations). Relational outcome can on the one hand be used to specify additional explanatory variables in RHEM since the probability of coauthoring may be influenced, for instance, by prior (shared) success of scientists. On the other hand relational outcome can also serve as a response variable in models seeking to explain the performance of scientific teams. To tackle the latter we propose relational hyperevent outcome models (RHOM) that are closely related with RHEM to the point that both model families can specify the likelihood of scientific collaboration - and the expected performance, respectively - with the same set of explanatory variables allowing to assess, for instance, whether variables leading to increased collaboration also tend to increase scientific impact. For illustration, we apply RHEM to empirical coauthor networks comprising more than 350,000 published papers by scientists working in three scientific disciplines.