Coin Flipping of \emph{Any} Constant Bias Implies One-Way Functions
Itay Berman, Iftach Haitner, Aris Tentes

TL;DR
This paper proves that secure coin-flipping protocols with any constant bias imply the existence of one-way functions, extending previous results to weaker protocols and smaller biases.
Contribution
It establishes that even very slight biases in coin-flipping protocols imply one-way functions, broadening the scope of prior implications.
Findings
Any constant bias coin-flip implies one-way functions
Extends previous results to weak coin-flipping protocols
Improves bias threshold from 0.207 to any constant
Abstract
We show that the existence of a coin-flipping protocol safe against \emph{any} non-trivial constant bias (\eg ) implies the existence of one-way functions. This improves upon a recent result of Haitner and Omri [FOCS '11], who proved this implication for protocols with bias . Unlike the result of Haitner and Omri, our result also holds for \emph{weak} coin-flipping protocols.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCryptography and Data Security · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
