Thermal evolution of Uranus and Neptune II -- Deep thermal boundary layer
Ludwig Scheibe, Nadine Nettelmann, Ronald Redmer

TL;DR
This study explores how a deep, thermally conductive boundary layer affects the thermal evolution and observed luminosities of Uranus and Neptune, challenging classical adiabatic models.
Contribution
It introduces a model incorporating a deep thermal boundary layer with variable properties, demonstrating its significant impact on planetary cooling and luminosity.
Findings
A thin conductive layer greatly influences planetary cooling.
Uranus's luminosity can be explained by a long-term near-equilibrium state.
Neptune's luminosity is affected by TBL thickness and thermal conductivity.
Abstract
Thermal evolution models suggest that the luminosities of both Uranus and Neptune are inconsistent with the classical assumption of an adiabatic interior. Such models commonly predict Uranus to be brighter and, recently, Neptune to be fainter than observed. In this work, we investigate the influence of a thermally conductive boundary layer on the evolution of Uranus- and Neptune-like planets. This thermal boundary layer (TBL) is assumed to be located deep in the planet, and be caused by a steep compositional gradient between a H-He-dominated outer envelope and an ice-rich inner envelope. We investigate the effect of TBL thickness, thermal conductivity, and the time of TBL formation on the planet's cooling behaviour. The calculations were performed with our recently developed tool based on the Henyey method for stellar evolution. We make use of state-of-the-art equations of state for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
