Active nematic defects and epithelial morphogenesis
Farzan Vafa, L. Mahadevan

TL;DR
This paper presents a minimal theoretical framework linking nematic defect dynamics, surface curvature, and cell growth, explaining morphogenetic phenomena in epithelial tissues and biological models like Hydra.
Contribution
It introduces a unified model connecting nematic defect behavior with tissue morphogenesis and validates it through experiments on neural progenitors and Hydra.
Findings
Defect locations correlate with curvature and growth patterns.
Cells accumulate at positive defects and deplete at negative defects.
Activity stabilizes specific defect configurations leading to tentacle formation.
Abstract
Inspired by recent experiments that highlight the role of nematic defects in the morphogenesis of epithelial tissues, we develop a minimal framework to study the dynamics of an active curved surface driven by its nematic texture. Allowing the surface to evolve via relaxational dynamics leads to a theory linking nematic defect dynamics, cellular division rates and Gaussian curvature. Regions of large positive (negative) curvature and positive (negative) growth are colocalized with the presence of positive (negative) defects. Applying this framework to the dynamics of cultured murine neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in an ex-vivo setting, we find that cells accumulate at positive defects and are depleted at negative defects. In contrast, applying this to the dynamics of a basal marine invertebrate \emph{Hydra} in an in-vivo setting, we show that activity stabilizes a bound defect state…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
