Pattern Complexity of Aperiodic Substitutive Subshifts
Etienne Moutot, Coline Petit-Jean

TL;DR
This paper investigates the pattern complexity of aperiodic substitutive subshifts, establishing quadratic bounds and demonstrating the optimality of recent complexity bounds in symbolic dynamics.
Contribution
It proves a quadratic lower bound on pattern complexity for certain substitutive subshifts and confirms the optimality of recent bounds for aperiodic subshifts.
Findings
Quadratic lower bound on pattern complexity for specific substitutive subshifts
Pattern complexity of these subshifts is in b1(n^2)
Recent bounds by Kari and Moutot are shown to be optimal
Abstract
This paper aims to better understand the link better understand the links between aperiodicity in subshifts and pattern complexity. Our main contribution deals with substitutive subshifts, an equivalent to substitutive tilings in the context of symbolic dynamics. For a class of substitutive subshifts, we prove a quadratic lower bound on their pattern complexity. Together with an already known upper bound, this shows that this class of substitutive subshifts has a pattern complexity in . We also prove that the recent bound of Kari and Moutot, showing that any aperiodic subshift has pattern complexity at least , is optimal for fixed and .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCellular Automata and Applications · semigroups and automata theory · DNA and Biological Computing
