Population Monotonicity in Matching Games
Han Xiao, Qizhi Fang

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when matching games admit population monotonic allocation schemes, providing a clear criterion and an efficient method to determine their existence, advancing cooperative game theory.
Contribution
It offers a necessary and sufficient characterization for the existence of population monotonic schemes in matching games, enabling efficient verification.
Findings
Characterization of when population monotonic schemes exist
Efficient algorithm to determine scheme existence
Theoretical advancement in cooperative game analysis
Abstract
A matching game is a cooperative profit game defined on an edge-weighted graph, where the players are the vertices and the profit of a coalition is the maximum weight of matchings in the subgraph induced by the coalition. A population monotonic allocation scheme is a collection of rules defining how to share the profit among players in each coalition such that every player is better off when the coalition expands. In this paper, we study matching games and provide a necessary and sufficient characterization for the existence of population monotonic allocation schemes. Our characterization also implies that whether a matching game admits population monotonic allocation schemes can be determined efficiently.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Auction Theory and Applications · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
