Quantum random walk and tight-binding model subject to projective measurements at random times
Debraj Das, Shamik Gupta

TL;DR
This paper investigates how repeated projective measurements at random times affect the survival probability in quantum systems, revealing exponential decay and characteristic power-law regimes depending on the measurement process and system size.
Contribution
It provides analytical and numerical insights into the survival probability dynamics under different measurement protocols in quantum walks and tight-binding models, highlighting universal behaviors.
Findings
Survival probability decays exponentially for large number of measurements when evolving with the projected state.
Power-law decay regimes with exponents -2 and -3/2 occur before exponential decay dominates.
Results are robust across various distributions of measurement intervals.
Abstract
What happens when a quantum system undergoing unitary evolution in time is subject to repeated projective measurements to the initial state at random times? A question of general interest is: How does the survival probability , namely, the probability that an initial state survives even after number of measurements, behave as a function of ? We address these issues in the context of two paradigmatic quantum systems, one, the quantum random walk evolving in discrete time, and the other, the tight-binding model evolving in continuous time, with both defined on a one-dimensional periodic lattice with a finite number of sites . For these two models, we present several numerical and analytical results that hint at the curious nature of quantum measurement dynamics. In particular, we unveil that when evolution after every projective measurement continues with the projected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
