
TL;DR
This paper proves that PSPACE and EXP are distinct complexity classes using a novel proof technique that involves limits of Turing machine acceptance times and recursion theory, bypassing the relativization barrier.
Contribution
It introduces a new proof method to separate PSPACE and EXP, leveraging limits and recursion theory in complexity class analysis.
Findings
PSPACE is not equal to EXP.
A new proof technique for class separation.
Application of recursion theory to complexity classes.
Abstract
This article shows that PSPACE not equal EXP. A simple but novel proof technique has been used to separate these two classes. Whether an arbitrary Turing machine accepts an input when the running time is limited has been computed in this paper. Then, the limit goes to infinity. Thus, methods of the recursion theory can be applied to problems of computational complexity theory without violating the relativization barrier.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
