The dominance of non-electron-phonon charge carrier interaction in highly-compressed superhydrides
E.F. Talantsev

TL;DR
This study investigates the charge carrier interactions in superhydrides and finds evidence suggesting non-electron-phonon mechanisms, such as electron-magnon or electron-electron interactions, may be responsible for their high-temperature superconductivity.
Contribution
The paper challenges the prevailing assumption that electron-phonon interaction drives superconductivity in superhydrides by providing resistance measurements indicating alternative mechanisms.
Findings
Superhydrides exhibit power-law exponents p between 1.8 and 3.2.
High-entropy alloy shows p ≈ 4.9, consistent with electron-phonon interaction.
Results suggest non-electron-phonon interactions are likely responsible for superconductivity in superhydrides.
Abstract
The primary mechanism governing the emergence of near-room-temperature superconductivity in superhydrides is widely accepted to be the electron-phonon interaction. If so, the temperature dependent resistance, R(T), in these materials should obey the Bloch-Gr\"uneisen equation, where the power-law exponent, p, should be equal to the exact integer value of p=5. On the other hand, there is a well-established theoretical result that pure electron-magnon interaction should be manifested by p=3, and p=2 is the value for pure electron-electron interaction. Here we aimed to reveal the type of charge carrier interaction in the layered transition metal dichalcogenides PdTe2, high-entropy alloy (ScZrNb)0.65[RhPd]0.35, and highly-compressed elemental boron and superhydrides H3S, LaHx, PrH9 and BaH12 by fitting the temperature dependent resistance of these materials to the Bloch-Gr\"uneisen equation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
