Notions of indifference for genericity: Union and subsequence sets
Tejas Bhojraj

TL;DR
This paper explores the concept of universal indifferent sets for 1-genericity, proving their non-existence under certain variants, but identifies a non-computable subsequence set for weak-1-genericity.
Contribution
It introduces two variants of universal indifferent sets for 1-genericity and proves their non-existence, while also demonstrating a non-computable subsequence set for weak-1-genericity.
Findings
No non-trivial universal sets for 1-genericity under the variants.
Existence of a non-computable subsequence set for weak-1-genericity.
Abstract
A set is said to be a universal indifferent set for -genericity if for every -generic and for all , is also -generic. Miller showed that there is no infinite universal indifferent set for -genericity. We introduce two variants (union and subsequence sets for -genericity) of the notion of universal indifference and prove that there are no non-trivial universal sets for -genericity with respect to these notions. In contrast, we show that there is a non-computable subsequence set for weak--genericity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
