First results of the CAST-RADES haloscope search for axions at 34.67 $\mu$eV
A. \'Alvarez Melc\'on, S. Arguedas Cuendis, J. Baier, K. Barth, H., Br\"auniger, S. Calatroni, G. Cantatore, F. Caspers, J.F Castel, S.A. Cetin,, C. Cogollos, T. Dafni, M. Davenport, A. Dermenev, K. Desch, A., D\'iaz-Morcillo, B. D\"obrich, H. Fischer, W. Funk, J.D Gallego

TL;DR
This paper reports the first results from the CAST-RADES haloscope, a novel detector for axion dark matter at 34.67 μeV, setting new exclusion limits and demonstrating the potential for broader mass range exploration.
Contribution
The work introduces a new resonant cavity design within the CAST experiment, achieving improved sensitivity and establishing a methodology for future wider mass range axion searches.
Findings
Set a new exclusion limit on axion-photon coupling at 34.67 μeV
Demonstrated the feasibility of using coupled sub-cavities in axion detection
Achieved sensitivity surpassing previous CAST limits at this mass
Abstract
We present results of the Relic Axion Dark-Matter Exploratory Setup (RADES), a detector which is part of the CERN Axion Solar Telescope (CAST), searching for axion dark matter in the 34.67eV mass range. A radio frequency cavity consisting of 5 sub-cavities coupled by inductive irises took physics data inside the CAST dipole magnet for the first time using this filter-like haloscope geometry. An exclusion limit with a 95% credibility level on the axion-photon coupling constant of g over a mass range of 34.6738 eV < < 34.6771 eV is set. This constitutes a significant improvement over the current strongest limit set by CAST at this mass and is at the same time one of the most sensitive direct searches for an axion dark matter candidate above the mass of 25 eV. The results also demonstrate the feasibility of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
