Accurate flux calibration of GW170817: is the X-ray counterpart on the rise?
E. Troja, B. O'Connor, G. Ryan, L. Piro, R. Ricci, B. Zhang, T. Piran,, G. Bruni, S. B. Cenko, H. van Eerten

TL;DR
This paper analyzes long-term X-ray observations of GW170817, revealing that the X-ray emission persists beyond previous predictions and challenges existing jet models, emphasizing the need for further multi-wavelength observations.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of late-time X-ray data, clarifies discrepancies, and questions the adequacy of current jet models for GW170817's afterglow.
Findings
X-ray emission detected 3.3 years post-merger
No evidence for X-ray rebrightening at late times
Tension between observations and narrow jet models
Abstract
X-ray emission from the gravitational wave transient GW170817 is well described as non-thermal afterglow radiation produced by a structured relativistic jet viewed off-axis. We show that the X-ray counterpart continues to be detected at 3.3 years after the merger. Such long-lasting signal is not a prediction of the earlier jet models characterized by a narrow jet core and a viewing angle of about 20 deg, and is spurring a renewed interest in the origin of the X-ray emission. We present a comprehensive analysis of the X-ray dataset aimed at clarifying existing discrepancies in the literature, and in particular the presence of an X-ray rebrightening at late times. Our analysis does not find evidence for an increase in the X-ray flux, but confirms a growing tension between the observations and the jet model. Further observations at radio and X-ray wavelengths would be critical to break the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
