There is no APTAS for 2-dimensional vector bin packing: Revisited
Arka Ray

TL;DR
This paper revisits the complexity of 2-dimensional vector bin packing and covering problems, proving no APTAS exists for these problems and establishing NP-hardness of achieving near-optimal approximations.
Contribution
The paper corrects a previous oversight by providing a revised proof that no APTAS exists for 2D vector bin packing and covering, and establishes tight NP-hardness bounds for approximation ratios.
Findings
No APTAS for 2D vector bin packing and covering.
NP-hardness of achieving near-perfect approximation ratios.
Extension to δ-skewed vector bin packing with hardness results.
Abstract
We study the Vector Bin Packing and the Vector Bin Covering problems, multidimensional generalizations of the Bin Packing and the Bin Covering problems, respectively. In the Vector Bin Packing, we are given a set of -dimensional vectors from and the aim is to partition the set into the minimum number of bins such that for each bin , each component of the sum of the vectors in is at most 1. Woeginger [Woe97] claimed that the problem has no APTAS for dimensions greater than or equal to 2. We note that there was a slight oversight in the original proof. In this work, we give a revised proof using some additional ideas from [BCKS06,CC09]. In fact, we show that it is NP-hard to get an asymptotic approximation ratio better than . An instance of Vector Bin Packing is called -skewed if every item has at most one dimension greater than . As…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimization and Packing Problems · graph theory and CDMA systems · Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
