Revisiting the archetypical wind accretor Vela X-1 in depth -- A case study of a well-known X-ray binary and the limits of our knowledge
Peter Kretschmar, Ileyk El Mellah, Silvia Mart\'inez-N\'u\~nez, Felix, F\"urst, Victoria Grinberg, Andreas A. C. Sander, Jakob van den Eijnden,, Nathalie Degenaar, Jes\'us Ma\'iz-Apell\'aniz, Francisco Jim\'enez Esteban,, Mercedes Ramos-Lerate, Enrique Utrilla

TL;DR
This comprehensive study of Vela X-1 synthesizes current knowledge, updates key parameters, and outlines future research directions, emphasizing the need for advanced models and coordinated observations to deepen understanding of this well-studied X-ray binary.
Contribution
The paper provides a robust, updated compilation of Vela X-1's parameters, identifies knowledge gaps, and proposes future research avenues with improved models and observations.
Findings
Updated distance and spectral classification for Vela X-1
Evidence for the supergiant nearing Roche lobe filling
Constraints on stellar wind clumpiness and lower wind velocities
Abstract
Context: Vela X-1 is one of the best studied X-ray binaries. Frequently though, specific values for its parameters have been used in subsequent studies without considering alternatives. Aims: We aim to provide a robust compilation and synthesis of the accumulated knowledge about Vela X-1 as a solid baseline for future studies and identify specific avenues of possible future research. Methods: We explore the literature for Vela X-1 and on modelling efforts, describing the evolution of the system knowledge. We also add information derived from public data, especially the Gaia EDR3 release. Results: We update the distance to Vela X-1, the spectral classification for HD 77518 and find that the supergiant may be very close to filling its Roche lobe. Constraints on the clumpiness of the stellar wind have improved. The orbit is very well determined, but the uncertain inclination limits…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
