Cosmology from weak lensing alone and implications for the Hubble tension
Alex Hall

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how weak lensing data constrains cosmological parameters, especially the Hubble constant, revealing limitations and potential improvements with future surveys and external priors.
Contribution
It clarifies the sensitivity of weak lensing to cosmological parameters and demonstrates how degeneracies can be broken to improve $H_0$ constraints.
Findings
Weak lensing constrains $S_8$ but not $H_0$ directly.
Combining lensing with BBN calibrates $H_0$ consistent with Planck.
Future surveys with external priors can achieve sub-percent $H_0$ precision.
Abstract
We investigate the origin of CDM parameter constraints in weak lensing, with a focus on the Hubble constant. We explain why current cosmic shear data are sensitive to the parameter combination , improving upon previous studies through use of the halo model. Motivated by the ongoing discrepancy in measurements of the Hubble constant from high and low redshift, we explain why cosmic shear provides almost no constraint on by showing how the lensing angular power spectrum depends on physical length scales in the dark matter distribution. We derive parameter constraints from galaxy lensing in KiDS and cosmic microwave background weak lensing from Planck and SPTpol, separately and jointly, showing how degeneracies between and can be broken. Using lensing and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis to calibrate the sound horizon…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
