Evaporation of dark matter from celestial bodies
Raghuveer Garani (INFN, Florence), Sergio Palomares-Ruiz (IFIC,, Valencia U. - CSIC)

TL;DR
This paper calculates the minimum dark matter particle mass that can be retained by celestial bodies, considering evaporation effects, and finds it to be approximately 0.7 GeV for typical galactic conditions, across a wide range of celestial objects.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive calculation of the dark matter evaporation mass for all spherical celestial bodies in hydrostatic equilibrium, highlighting the exponential tail's importance and robustness of the result.
Findings
Evaporation mass is approximately 0.7 GeV for typical galactic conditions.
The evaporation mass varies less than a factor of three across a wide range of scattering cross sections.
Dependence on galactic and particle parameters is only logarithmic, with small impact from density and temperature profiles.
Abstract
Scatterings of galactic dark matter (DM) particles with the constituents of celestial bodies could result in their accumulation within these objects. Nevertheless, the finite temperature of the medium sets a minimum mass, the evaporation mass, that DM particles must have in order to remain trapped. DM particles below this mass are very likely to scatter to speeds higher than the escape velocity, so they would be kicked out of the capturing object and escape. Here, we compute the DM evaporation mass for all spherical celestial bodies in hydrostatic equilibrium, spanning the mass range , for constant scattering cross sections and -wave annihilations. We illustrate the critical importance of the exponential tail of the evaporation rate, which has not always been appreciated in recent literature, and obtain a robust result: for the geometric value of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
