Euclid: Estimation of the impact of correlated readout noise for flux measurements with the Euclid NISP instrument
A. Jimenez Munoz, J. Macias-Perez, A. Secroun, W. Gillard, B. Kubik,, N. Auricchio, A. Balestra, C. Bodendorf, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Brescia,, J. Brinchmann, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, J. Carretero, R. Casas, M., Castellano, S. Cavuoti, A. Cimatti, R. Cledassou, G. Congedo

TL;DR
This paper models and characterizes correlated readout noise in Euclid's NISP detectors, deriving an analytical covariance expression that improves flux measurement accuracy and reduces bias in in-flight data analysis.
Contribution
It provides an analytical model for correlated readout noise in NISP detectors and demonstrates its effectiveness in reducing flux measurement bias.
Findings
Correlated noise significantly impacts flux measurements.
The analytical covariance model reduces bias by up to four times.
Bias remains negligible even with white noise approximation.
Abstract
The Euclid satellite, to be launched by ESA in 2022, will be a major instrument for cosmology for the next decades. \Euclid\ is composed of two instruments: the Visible (VIS) instrument and the Near Infrared Spectromete and Photometer (NISP). In this work we estimate the implications of correlated readout noise in the NISP detectors for the final in-flight flux measurements. Considering the multiple accumulated (MACC) readout mode, for which the UTR (Up The Ramp) exposure frames are averaged in groups, we derive an analytical expression for the noise covariance matrix between groups in the presence of correlated noise. We also characterize the correlated readout noise properties in the NISP engineering grade detectors using long dark integrations. For this purpose, we assume a -like noise model and fit the model parameters to the data, obtaining typical values of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
