Homology of strict $\omega$-categories
L\'eonard Guetta

TL;DR
This paper compares classical and polygraphic homology of strict ω-categories, establishing criteria for when they coincide, and explores properties of free ω-categories and homological coherence using homotopical algebra tools.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of homological coherence for strict ω-categories and provides criteria and results for detecting and analyzing this property.
Findings
All small categories are homologically coherent as strict ω-categories.
Conjecture: a cofibrant 2-category is homologically coherent iff it is bubble-free.
If D is a free strict ω-category on a polygraph and F is a discrete Conduché ω-functor, then C is also free.
Abstract
In this dissertation, we compare the "classical" homology of an -category (defined as the homology of its Street nerve) with its polygraphic homology. More precisely, we prove that both homologies generally do not coincide and call homologically coherent the particular strict -categories for which polygraphic homology and homology of the nerve do coincide. The goal pursued is to find abstract and concrete criteria to detect homologically coherent -categories. For example, we prove that all (small) categories, considered as strict -categories with unit cells above dimension 1, are homologically coherent. We also introduce the notion of bubble-free 2-category and conjecture that a cofibrant 2-category is homologically coherent if and only if it is bubble-free. We also prove important results concerning free strict -categories on polygraphs (also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
