Neutral vs Ion Linewidths in Barnard 5: Evidence for Penetration by MHD Waves
Jaime E. Pineda (1), Anika Schmiedeke (1), Paola Caselli (1), Steven, W. Stahler (2), David T. Frayer (3), Sarah E. Church (4), Andrew I. Harris, (5) ((1) Max-Planck-Institut fur extraterrestrische Physik, (2) Astronomy, Department, University of California, Berkeley

TL;DR
This study compares ion and neutral linewidths in Barnard 5, finding ions have broader lines than neutrals, suggesting magnetic field oscillations influence turbulence dissipation in dense cores.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence that ions can have broader linewidths than neutrals in dense cores, challenging previous assumptions about turbulence dissipation.
Findings
Ion linewidths are systematically broader than neutral linewidths.
The sonic Mach number is higher for ions than neutrals.
Magnetic field oscillations may influence turbulence in dense cores.
Abstract
Dense cores are the final place where turbulence is dissipated. It has been proposed from theoretical arguments that the non-thermal velocity dispersion should be narrower both for molecular ions (compared to neutrals) and for transitions with higher critical densities. To test these hypotheses, we compare the velocity dispersion of NH (1--0) (n = cm_3_{\rm crit}=2\times10^3^{-3}), in the dense core Barnard 5. We analyse well resolved and high signal-to-noise observations of NH (1,1) and (2,2) obtained with combining GBT and VLA data, and NH (1--0) obtained with GBT Argus, which present a similar morphology. % Surprisingly, the non-thermal velocity dispersion of the ion is systematically higher than that of the neutral by 20\%. The derived sonic Mach number, , has peak values…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
