Multi-messenger Detection Rates and distributions of Binary Neutron Star Mergers and Their Cosmological Implications
Jiming Yu, Haoran Song, Shunke Ai, He Gao, Fayin Wang, Yu Wang, Youjun, Lu, Wenjuan Fang, Wen Zhao

TL;DR
This paper estimates the rates and distributions of binary neutron star mergers detectable through multi-messenger observations, highlighting their potential to constrain dark energy parameters in future gravitational-wave detector eras.
Contribution
It investigates multi-messenger detection rates and distributions of BNS mergers across different GW detector generations, incorporating models of sGRBs and afterglows, and assesses their cosmological implications.
Findings
Detection rates range from 300 to 3500 per year with advanced detectors.
Most events have redshifts below 2 and inclination angles under 20 degrees.
Potential constraints on dark energy parameters are estimated as Δw0 ≈ 0.02-0.05 and Δwa ≈ 0.1-0.4.
Abstract
The gravitational-wave (GW) events, produced by the coalescence of binary neutron-stars (BNS), can be treated as the standard sirens to probe the expansion history of the Universe, if their redshifts could be determined from the electromagnetic observations. For the high-redshift () events, the short -ray bursts (sGRBs) and the afterglows are always considered as the primary electromagnetic counterparts. In this paper, by investigating various models of sGRBs and afterglows, we discuss the rates and distributions of BNS mergers' multi-messenger observations with GW detectors in second-generation (2G), 2.5G, 3G era with the detectable sGRBs and the afterglows. For instance, for Cosmic Explorer GW detector, the rate is about (300-3500) per year with GECAM-like detector for -ray emissions and LSST/WFST detector for optical afterglows. In addition, we find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
