Theta Correspondence and Arthur packets
Rui Chen, Jialiang Zou

TL;DR
This paper proves the independence of local packets in Arthur's multiplicity formula for certain groups at non-Archimedean places and confirms their equivalence to Arthur/Mok's local A-packets in quasi-split cases.
Contribution
It establishes the independence of local packets from dual-pair choices and their equivalence to known A-packets for specific groups.
Findings
Local packets are independent of dual-pair choices at non-Archimedean places.
In quasi-split cases, local packets match Arthur/Mok's A-packets.
The results extend the understanding of Arthur's multiplicity formula for orthogonal and unitary groups.
Abstract
In spirit of Gan-Ichino's work on the Arthur's multiplicity formula for metaplectic groups, we have established the Arthur's multiplicity formula for even orthogonal or unitary groups with Witt index less than or equal to one. In that multiplicity formula, some local packets defined using the stable range theta lifts are involved. In this paper, we prove that at non-Archimedean places, the definition of the local packets involved in that multiplicity formula is independent of the choice of the dual-pairs used in their construction. Moreover, at those places where the groups are quasi-split, we prove that the local packets involved are the same as the local A-packets defined by Arthur/ Mok.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
