TL;DR
This paper explores algorithmic strategies to enhance the quality and diversity of co-evolved morphologies and controllers in soft tensegrity modular robots, aiming to improve task performance and design variety.
Contribution
It introduces a novel Double Map MAP-Elites algorithm that co-evolves morphologies and controllers with enhanced diversity, outperforming existing methods in design illumination.
Findings
DM-ME provides a richer pool of robotic designs.
ViE-NEAT outperforms MAP-Elites in goal-reaching.
DM-ME excels in diversity across tasks.
Abstract
Designing optimal soft modular robots is difficult, due to non-trivial interactions between morphology and controller. Evolutionary algorithms (EAs), combined with physical simulators, represent a valid tool to overcome this issue. In this work, we investigate algorithmic solutions to improve the Quality Diversity of co-evolved designs of Tensegrity Soft Modular Robots (TSMRs) for two robotic tasks, namely goal reaching and squeezing trough a narrow passage. To this aim, we use three different EAs, i.e., MAP-Elites and two custom algorithms: one based on Viability Evolution (ViE) and NEAT (ViE-NEAT), the other named Double Map MAP-Elites (DM-ME) and devised to seek diversity while co-evolving robot morphologies and neural network (NN)-based controllers. In detail, DM-ME extends MAP-Elites in that it uses two distinct feature maps, referring to morphologies and controllers respectively,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
