Completing the puzzle: why studies in non-human primates are needed to better understand the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation
Sebastian J Lehmann, Brian D Corneil

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of non-human primate models in understanding how non-invasive brain stimulation affects neural activity and behavior, highlighting their potential to improve therapeutic and experimental outcomes.
Contribution
It advocates for using NHP models to study the complex effects of NIBS on interconnected brain networks and behavior, addressing current knowledge gaps.
Findings
NHP models can elucidate the neural mechanisms of NIBS effects.
Studying the oculomotor network provides valuable insights into NIBS-induced changes.
NHP research can optimize NIBS techniques for better efficacy and safety.
Abstract
Brain stimulation is a core method in neuroscience. Numerous non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are currently in use in basic and clinical research, and recent advances promise the ability to non-invasively access deep brain structures. While encouraging, there is a surprising gap in our understanding of precisely how NIBS perturbs neural activity throughout an interconnected network, and how such perturbed neural activity ultimately links to behaviour. In this review, we will consider why non-human primate (NHP) models of NIBS are ideally situated to address this gap in knowledge, and will consider why the oculomotor network that moves our line of sight offers a particularly valuable platform in which to empirically test hypothesis regarding NIBS-induced changes in brain and behaviour. NHP models of NIBS will enable investigation of the complex, dynamic effects of brain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
