Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception
Marian Kupczynski

TL;DR
This paper applies the Contextuality-by-Default framework to Bell tests, demonstrating that contextuality is fundamental and should be systematically examined in quantum experiments, challenging traditional assumptions about non-contextuality.
Contribution
It introduces a novel analysis of Bell tests using the Contextuality-by-Default approach, accounting for inconsistent connectedness and setting-dependent variables.
Findings
Bell inequality violations explained by contextual models
Inconsistent connectedness is inherent in Bell test data
Contextuality appears as a fundamental rule in quantum measurements
Abstract
Contextuality and entanglement are valuable resources for quantum computing and quantum information. Bell inequalities are used to certify entanglement; thus, it is important to understand why and how they are violated. Quantum mechanics and behavioral sciences teach us that random variables measuring the same content (the answer to the same Yes or No question) may vary, if measured jointly with other random variables. Alice and Bob raw data confirm Einsteinian non-signaling, but setting dependent experimental protocols are used to create samples of coupled pairs of distant outcomes and to estimate correlations. Marginal expectations, estimated using these final samples, depend on distant settings. Therefore, a system of random variables measured in Bell tests is inconsistently connected and it should be analyzed using a Contextuality-by-Default approach, what is done for the first time…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
