Accuracy and precision: a new view on kinematic assessment of solid-state hinges and compliant mechanisms
Lucio Flavio Campanile, Stephanie Kirmse, Alexander Hasse

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel, eigenvalue-based method to quantitatively assess the accuracy and precision of compliant mechanisms, addressing ambiguities in traditional evaluation criteria by leveraging concepts from measurement theory.
Contribution
It proposes a new approach using eigenvalue analysis of hinge stiffness to evaluate compliant mechanisms' quality, improving clarity over existing methods.
Findings
Eigenvalue analysis effectively quantifies accuracy and precision.
The method reduces ambiguities in traditional assessment criteria.
It provides a more objective evaluation of compliant mechanisms.
Abstract
Compliant mechanisms are alternatives to conventional mechanisms which exploit elastic strain to produce desired deformations instead of using moveable parts. They are designed for a kinematic task (providing desired deformations) but do not possess a kinematics in the strict sense. This leads to difficulties while assessing the quality of a compliant mechanism's design. The kinematics of a compliant mechanism can be seen as a fuzzy property. There is no unique kinematics, since every deformation need a particular force system to act; however, certain deformations are easier to obtain than others. A parallel can be made with measurement theory: the measured value of a quantity is not unique, but exists as statistic distribution of measures. A representative measure of this distribution can be chosen to evaluate how far the measures divert from a reference value. Based on this analogy,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
