The Deviation of the Broad-line Region Size Between Reverberation Mapping and Spectroastrometry
Xiaer Zhang, Zhicheng He, Tinggui Wang, Hengxiao Guo

TL;DR
This study investigates systematic deviations between reverberation mapping and spectroastrometry size measurements of the broad-line region in AGNs, finding line-dependent differences that impact future Hubble constant measurements.
Contribution
The paper evaluates size deviations between RM and SA measurements across six hydrogen lines using LOC models, identifying line pairs with minimal deviation and uncertainty for cosmological applications.
Findings
Radius ratios deviate systematically from 1, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88.
Pa(SA)/Hb(RM) and Ha(SA)/Hb(RM) pairs have ratios closest to 1 and smaller uncertainties.
Results inform optimal line pairs for future SARM measurements to constrain cosmology.
Abstract
The combination of the linear size from reverberation mapping (RM) and the angular distance of the broad line region (BLR) from spectroastrometry (SA) in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) can be used to measure the Hubble constant . Recently, Wang et al. (2020) successfully employed this approach and estimated from 3C 273. However, there may be a systematic deviation between the response-weighted radius (RM measurement) and luminosity-weighted radius (SA measurement), especially when different broad lines are adopted for size indicators (e.g., \hb\ for RM and \pa\ for SA). Here we evaluate the size deviations measured by six pairs of hydrogen lines (e.g., \hb, \ha\ and \pa) via the locally optimally emitting cloud (LOC) models of BLR. We find that the radius ratios (=/) of the same line deviated systematically from 1 (0.85-0.88) with dispersions between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
