On the shear-current effect: toward understanding why theories and simulations have mutually and separately conflicted

TL;DR

This paper investigates the shear-current effect in mean-field dynamo theory, resolving longstanding discrepancies by combining analytical methods and simulations to understand the sign and behavior of turbulent coefficients under various conditions.

Contribution

It reveals the dependence of the kinetic shear-current effect on the energy spectral index and reconciles conflicting theoretical and simulation results.

Findings

$eta^u_{21}$ can change sign depending on Reynolds number and spectral steepness

$eta^b_{21}$ remains negative across conditions

The results reconcile differences between SOCA and STC approaches

Abstract

The shear-current effect (SCE) of mean-field dynamo theory refers to the combination of a shear flow and a turbulent coefficient $\beta_{21}$ with a favorable negative sign for exponential mean-field growth, rather than positive for diffusion. There have been long standing disagreements among theoretical calculations and comparisons of theory with numerical experiments as to the sign of kinetic ($\beta^u_{21}$) and magnetic ($\beta^b_{21}$) contributions. To resolve these discrepancies, we combine an analytical approach with simulations, and show that unlike $\beta^b_{21}$, the kinetic SCE $\beta^u_{21}$ has a strong dependence on the kinetic energy spectral index and can transit from positive to negative values at $\mathcal{O}(10)$ Reynolds numbers if the spectrum is not too steep. Conversely, $\beta^b_{21}$ is always negative regardless of the spectral index and Reynolds numbers. For very steep energy spectra, the positive $\beta^u_{21}$ can dominate even at energy equipartition $u_\text{rms}\simeq b_\text{rms}$, resulting in a positive total $\beta_{21}$ even though $\beta^b_{21}<0$. Our findings bridge the gap between the seemingly contradictory results from the second-order-correlation approximation (SOCA) versus the spectral-$\tau$ closure (STC), for which opposite signs for $\beta^u_{21}$ have been reported, with the same sign for $\beta^b_{21}<0$. The results also offer an explanation for the simulations that find $\beta^u_{21}>0$ and an inconclusive overall sign of $\beta_{21}$ for $\mathcal{O}(10)$ Reynolds numbers. The transient behavior of $\beta^u_{21}$ is demonstrated using the kinematic test-field method. We compute dynamo growth rates for cases with or without rotation, and discuss opportunities for further work.