Structural Beauty: A Structure-based Approach to Quantifying the Beauty of an Image
Bin Jiang, Chris de Rijke

TL;DR
This paper introduces a quantitative method for measuring the structural beauty of images based on their substructures and hierarchy, revealing objective aesthetic qualities across different artworks and architectural styles.
Contribution
It develops a novel approach to compute structural beauty using substructure count and hierarchy, grounded in the concept of living structure and wholeness.
Findings
Blue Poles is more structurally beautiful than Mona Lisa.
Traditional buildings are generally more beautiful than modernist ones.
The approach suggests beauty is largely a fact rather than personal opinion.
Abstract
To say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder means that beauty is largely subjective so varies from person to person. While the subjectivity view is commonly held, there is also an objectivity view that seeks to measure beauty or aesthetics in some quantitative manners. Christopher Alexander has long discovered that beauty or coherence highly correlates to the number of subsymmetries or substructures and demonstrated that there is a shared notion of beauty - structural beauty - among people and even different peoples, regardless of their faiths, cultures, and ethnicities. This notion of structural beauty arises directly out of living structure or wholeness, a physical and mathematical structure that underlies all space and matter. Based on the concept of living structure, this paper develops an approach for computing the structural beauty or life of an image (L) based on the number…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
