Revisiting the compatibility problem between the gauge principle and the observability of the canonical orbital angular momentum in the Landau problem
Masashi Wakamatsu, Yoshio Kitadono, Liping Zou, Pengming Zhang

TL;DR
This paper investigates the longstanding issue of whether the canonical orbital angular momentum quantum number in the Landau problem is observable, examining both particle and wave aspects to reconcile gauge invariance with physical observability.
Contribution
It provides a more comprehensive analysis of the gauge compatibility problem by considering both particle-like and wave-like properties of Landau electrons.
Findings
Reveals the non-trivial rotational dynamics of Landau electrons depending on quantum number m.
Clarifies the gauge invariance of the canonical OAM in the Landau problem.
Offers insights into the observability of quantum numbers in gauge theories.
Abstract
As is widely-known, the eigen-functions of the Landau problem in the symmetric gauge are specified by two quantum numbers. The first is the familiar Landau quantum number , whereas the second is the magnetic quantum number , which is the eigen-value of the canonical orbital angular momentum (OAM) operator of the electron. The eigen-energies of the system depend only on the first quantum number , and the second quantum number does not correspond to any direct observables. This seems natural since the canonical OAM is generally believed to be a {\it gauge-variant} quantity, and observation of a gauge-variant quantity would contradict a fundamental principle of physics called the {\it gauge principle}. In recent researches, however, Bliohk et al. analyzed the motion of helical electron beam along the direction of a uniform magnetic field, which was mostly neglected in past…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
