Sharing classical secrets with continuous-variable entanglement: Composable security and network coding advantage
Nathan Walk, Jens Eisert

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that multi-partite continuous-variable entanglement-based secret sharing protocols can outperform point-to-point quantum key distribution methods in certain network configurations, with proven security and practical experimental parameters.
Contribution
It provides the first rigorous analysis of multi-partite entanglement secret sharing in a composable, finite-size regime and shows its advantage over QKD in realistic network scenarios.
Findings
Multi-partite schemes outperform QKD in lossy network topologies.
Security is established in a composable, finite-size framework.
Experimental parameters are identified where multi-partite entanglement offers a genuine advantage.
Abstract
Secret sharing is a multi-party cryptographic primitive that can be applied to a network of partially distrustful parties for encrypting data that is both sensitive (it must remain secure) and important (it must not be lost or destroyed). When sharing classical secrets (as opposed to quantum states), one can distinguish between protocols that leverage bi-partite quantum key distribution (QKD) and those that exploit multi-partite entanglement. The latter class are known to be vulnerable to so-called participant attacks and, while progress has been made recently, there is currently no analysis that quantifies their performance in the composable, finite-size regime which has become the gold standard for QKD security. Given this - and the fact that distributing multi-partite entanglement is typically challenging - one might well ask: Is there any virtue in pursuing multi-partite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
