Testing the fossil field hypothesis: could strongly magnetised OB stars produce all known magnetars?
Ekaterina I. Makarenko, Andrei P. Igoshev, A.F. Kholtygin

TL;DR
This study investigates whether the fossil field hypothesis can explain the magnetic properties of neutron stars, concluding that a simple fossil origin cannot account for the observed magnetic field differences between pulsars and magnetars.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of magnetic field distributions in massive stars and tests the fossil field hypothesis against neutron star populations using population synthesis.
Findings
Fossil field hypothesis cannot simultaneously explain pulsar and magnetar magnetic fields.
Magnetars likely do not originate solely from fossil magnetic fields of progenitor stars.
Magnetic field differences of 2.7 DEX are insufficient to produce observed neutron star magnetic populations.
Abstract
Stars of spectral types O and B produce neutron stars (NSs) after supernova explosions. Most of NSs are strongly magnetised including normal radio pulsars with G and magnetars with G. A fraction of 7-12 per cent of massive stars are also magnetised with G and some are weakly magnetised with G. It was suggested that magnetic fields of NSs could be the fossil remnants of magnetic fields of their progenitors. This work is dedicated to study this hypothesis. First, we gather all modern precise measurements of surface magnetic fields in O, B and A stars. Second, we estimate parameters for log-normal distribution of magnetic fields in B stars and found (G), for strongly magnetised and (G), for weakly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
